Featured
Table of Contents
Specifically CMOs and those responsible for a business's marketing success. AI-generated answers appear like a direct danger to the standard organic traffic sites used to receive from search engines. Before, you needed to click a site to see the outcomes. Today, LLMs just rip the content on sites and people no longer need to go to a website anymore.
While I personally think this risk is blown completely out of proportion (based on data from websites I've personally seen), I do not believe it's an excuse to neglect it entirely. From my own experience growing both blogs and YouTube channels, specifically to sell something, I can inform you that video converts way more than composed content.
And the viewer can detect more subtleties in your message. It's a lot easier to inform if someone is lying or complete of it if you can see their facial expressions and their tone of voice. So YouTube needs to certainly remain in your SEO and material method. Usage video as demand generation and a way to develop trust with an audience.
And due to the fact that you have developed the trust with video, your traditional SEO efforts will transform better. However there's a lot more to it. Earlier this year, I had a hunch that if I turned a few of my finest ranking post into YouTube videos, and embedded them into my existing article, my blog posts would rank even better.
I used rank in between 2-3 for the keyword "AI marketing tools." I made a YouTube video about the subject, embedded it into that post, and I have actually been ranking # 1 given that. So in 2026, think about YouTube videos as a way to boost your SEO blog site posts to rank even better.
In 2025, we saw everyone talking about how AI search was going to take over Google. Beyond just SEO, the marketing community as a whole begun to get bombarded with influencers trying to ride the AI buzz train.
It became tough to discover relied on sources that weren't biased or had a covert program to sell us something. While I do believe there are advantages to using LLMs in our workflows, I do believe it has actually been overhyped. And in 2026, I forecast lots of marketers will realize that ChatGPT and Perplexity are just a little part of the SEO market.
Google still dominates 90% market share and with its AI Mode and AI Overviews, it remains in the ideal position to win the AI search engine race. Search behavior hasn't fundamentally shifted far from Google. Beyond just that, there are a couple of things that have rubbed me the wrong way about the AI SEO pattern.
What these marketers do not realize is that Things like homepages, pricing pages, or bottom of funnel material, tends to be shown in ChatGPT. The educational top of funnel material is "consumed up" by LLMs and revealed to users without anywhere to click.
Google's conversion rates show less because the traffic is higher due to it being watered down by all the top of funnel material that is in the formula. Other things like how ChatGPT can make things up, it never completely follows triggers properly (i.e.
I do still believe that larger companies will business aside an experimental budget to test things like ChatGPT apps and other AI SEO tools.
Do not do it. These techniques may work now in ChatGPT and other LLMs, but they're short-term plays that will ultimately get penalized. Focus on white hat methods that build genuine authority and trust over time rather of going after quick wins that will not last. The 2000s are back. Scammy keyword packing tactics, spending for low-grade backlinks, delivering thousands of ineffective posts all in the name of ranking high.
Now, the algorithm is mature enough to overlook all that rubbish. ChatGPT and other LLM algorithms are not as mature. I can't name this person, but I satisfied an SEO director at a big banking business. This individual informed me they (and all their rivals) are producing microsites (like little blog sites) on various domains.
And from there, they are using their primary business domain, that has a very strong brand authority, and sending backlinks to the microsite. And this has actually resulted in higher rankings for their brand in LLMs like ChatGPT.It blew my mind that big, credible business are doing this. And I recognized just how much black hat (or grey hat) tactics are going on behind the scenes.
In 2026, I forecast these strategies will continue to occur. Until ChatGPT's algorithm gets as clever as Google's search algorithm.
Share genuine insights, utilize your own images and videos, and develop topical authority in your specific niche. This is how solo creators and small teams can beat huge brands in 2026. This is one of the most significant SEO trends for material marketing I'm seeing right now.
You require a real service, be it a newsletter service, a service-based company, SaaS company, or ecommerce store. And after that you add on this human-centered specific niche blogging to the website to naturally grow your core product/service offering. In 2026, I forecast that Google's algorithm will continue to get smarter about which web pages consist of AI content and which don't.
In reality, I know lots of individuals silently squashing it with AI produced content (even pursuing top of funnel keywords). What I am stating is that engaging, human material will outrank AI produced material with no original insights. There are two routes I see with SEO's today: Produce countless AI-generated post and get them to rank in the middle/bottom of page 1.
Produce a hundred human blog posts and get them to rank at the top of the very first page. Quality over quantity. The very first path is based upon large volume, and can cause traffic development. You do run the risk of a possible algorithm update harming your rankings. And anybody who composes better human material will rank greater in positions 1-3. The second path is slower, but can yield higher ranking positions and more trust with readers.
Latest Posts
Securing Your Digital Platform for AI Discovery
Why Machine Learning Influences Future Search Signals
Evaluating the JavaScript Frameworks in 2026
